The Use of Diglossia in Sumenep Regency, Madura

Naila Wildatis Shofyah

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out how disglossia is used in Sumenep Regency, Madura and how its implementation in society. This research is descriptive qualitative by using collecting data technique of interview between the source and the researcher. The result of this research shows that the use of variety of diglossia used in Sumenep is divided into three; there are high, middle, and low variety. High variety of diglossia is used to speak to people with a higher social status. The middle variety of diglossia is used to speak between the older to the younger, and the low variety diglossia is used to speak between friends. Besides, the use high variety of diglossia is mostly applied in the government, and religious activity while middle, and low variety are mostly applied in family, friendship, and selling and buying activity as more higher status people, then the use variety of language used will be higher

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bloomfield, L. (1993). Language. Neywork: Holt.

Chalimatus, S., & Fathur, R. (2018). Diglossia of Javanese-Indonesia in Senior High School Educational Domain: Sociolinguistics Study in Tegal Regency. Seloka: Journal of Language Education and Indonesian Literature, 7 (1), 9-17. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/22621/10717

Fasold, R. (1984). The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Moleong, J. L. (2007). Methodology of Qualitative Research. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Standlbauer, Susanne. (2010). Language Ideologies in the Arabic diglossia of Egypt, in Colorado Research in Linguistics, Vol 22, 1-19.

Taylor, G., K. Taylor. (2002). Billingualism and Diglossia in Late Antique Syria and Mesopotamia, in Billingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and Written Word, Ed, 298-331. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245062.003.0012

Walters, Keith. (2003). Fergies’s Prescience: The Changing Nature of Diglossia in Tunisia, International Journal of Social Language, (163), 77-109. DOI:10.1515/ijsl.2003.048

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.