BUZZ GROUP-BASED STRATEGY IN EFL READING CLASSROOM

Authors

  • Juang Kurniawan Syahruzah Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v4i1.543

Abstract

The intention of this study is to describe the effectiveness of buzz group in EFL reading classroom of English Department students of PGRI University. The comprehension analysis is intended by comparing the answer of EFL reading classroom students in reading exercises. In order to sequence the reading comprehension of the EFL reading classroom the pre-test and post-test of reading exercises are measured. The experiment of reading comprehension includes the recruitment of 40 students of EFL reading classroom, the training, and exercising of reading text in reading exercises. These students are all first-year female teacher training students at PBI-UPY and aged between 17 and 23. The measurement is compare with pre-test and post-test of reading exercises. Standard measurement is comparison of students answer in pre-test and post-test of reading exercises.

References

Baker, L., & Brown, A. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In D. P. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.

Barnett, M. A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategies use affects L2 comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 72, 150-162.

Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131-156.

Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 163-494.

Block, E. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 319-342.

Brown, A., &Palincsar, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 727-752.

Carrell, P. L. (1989) Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 120-133.

Carrell, P., Pharis, B. G., &Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 646-678.

Dansereau, D. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J. Segal & S. Chipman (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Garner, R. (1980). Monitoring of understanding: An investigation of good and poor readers' awareness of induced miscomprehension of text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 55-63.

Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

Gaskins, I. (1994). Classroom applications of cognitive science: Teaching poor readers how to learn, think, and problem solve. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom Lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 129-154). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners. System, 5, 110-123.

Janzen, J. (1996). Teaching strategic reading. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 6-9.

Weinstein, C., & Underwood, V. (1985). Learning strategies. In J. Segal & S. Chipman (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-04

How to Cite

Syahruzah, J. K. (2020). BUZZ GROUP-BASED STRATEGY IN EFL READING CLASSROOM. Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v4i1.543

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017): Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics

Section

Articles

Citation Check