ASSESING CONTENT VALIDITY ON THE CRITICAL THINKING TEST IN CRITICAL LISTENING CLASS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v6i1.1078Abstrak
Critical thinking is a skill that should be developed to enable students cope with 21st century challenges. Critical Listening class is one of the compulsory subjects in English Language Education Study Program of Mercu Buana University Yogyakarta which goal is to enhance students critical thinking whenever they listen to particular information. However, the instrument to measure the students’ critical listening skill has not been developed yet. Therefore, this study aims at developing an instrument to develop students’ critical listening skill. The study was started by developing the conceptual definition and operational definition of critical thinking and critical listening. Afterwards, a set of instrument containing of 40 items were developed. Identifying instrument content validity is the first step the focus of this study. The instrument items were then validated by 3 experts. The result of this study showed that 30 items on the instrument was considered valid as they had I-CVI ranged from 0,8-1. The other 10 items were deemed to be invalid since the I-CVI is lower than 0,78. The result of this study encouraged the researcher to revise the instrument and improve the validity of the items.
Referensi
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Davis, L.L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5, 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
Ennis, Robert H. (1993) Critical thinking assessment, Theory Into Practice, 32:3, 179-186,
DOI: 10.1080/00405849309543594
Mukti, Taufik S. & Istiyono Edi. 2018. Instrument for Assessing Critical Thinking Ability of X Grade High School Students on Biology Learning. BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi.
Kay, K. (2008). Preparing every child for the 21st century. Xi’an China: Paper presented in the APEC EdNet-Xi’an (Symposium).
Polite, Denise F. and Beck, Tatano Cheryl. (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What’s Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489–497. Wiley Periodicals
Retnawati, Heri (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Parama Publishing. Yogyakarta.
Saputra, M. J. (2018). he assessment of critical thinking skill tests for accounting students of vocational high schools.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Chen T, Hsu H-M, Stamm SW, Yeh R. (2019). Creating an instrument for evaluating critical thinking apps for college students. E-Learning and Digital Media: 16(6):433-454. doi:10.1177/2042753019860615
Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Series of books in psychology.
Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings. Boston: Kluwer Academic
Publishers. In Baron, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.),Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice(pp. 9–26).
Heijltjes, A., Gog Van, T., Pass, Fred. (2014) Improving Students’ Critical Thinking: Empirical Support for Explicit Instructions Combined with Practice: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 28: 518–530 DOI: 10.1002/acp.3025
