EFEKTIFITAS PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS LABORATORIUM PADA MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN SEJARAH IKIP PGRI PONTIANAK

Penulis

  • suwarni suwarni IKIP PGRI Pontianak
  • Emi Tipuk Lestari Tipuk Lestari IKIP PGRI Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31316/fkip.v3i1.517

Kata Kunci:

History Education Laboratory, Learning Outcomes.

Abstrak

The purpose of this study 1) Measuring learning outcomes in the control class, 2) Measuring learning outcomes in the experimental class, 3) Measuring the effect of learning outcomes in the control and experimental classes, 4) Measuring the influence of using the History Education laboratory for students. Method used is an experiment with a quasi experimental research design and a Posstest-Only Control Design.

The results of this study were 1) The average student learning outcomes in the control class were 66.33 which was classified as sufficient, 2) The average learning outcomes of students who were taught or in the experimental class were 77.42 which were classified as good, 3) The average significant difference was The average learning outcomes of the control class and the experimental class used the t-test parametric statistical test. Because tcount> ttable or 4.43> 1.996, then Ha is accepted at the 5% significance level. So the conclusion is that there is a difference in the average value of the control class and the average value of the experimental class, 4) Based on calculations using the effect size, it is obtained that Es <80, or Es = 0.55, it can be concluded that the use of historical education laboratories is moderate and has an effect on student learning outcomes.

 


Referensi

Creswell, J.W. (1994). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Disign : Choosing among Five Traditions. California ; Thousand Oaks, Sage.

DEPDIKNAS .(2003). Undang-undangRevublikIndodesia No. 20 Tahun 2003 TentangSistemPendidikanNasional. Jakarta: TransmediaPustaka.

Dimyati&Mudjiono. 2009. Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.

Miles M.B&Huberman A.M. 1992.Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.

Prastowo, Andi. 2013. PengembanganBahan Ajar Tematik.EdisiPertama. Jakarta : DIVA Press.

Sajaya, Wina. 2013. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Pada Proses. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Grup.

Sugiarto, AgusdanTeguhWahyono.(2005). ManajemenKearsipanModeren. Jogjakarta: PenerbitGava Media.

Sugiyono.(2012).MetodePenelitianPendidikanPendekatanKuantitatifKualitatifdan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutopo H. B. 2006. MetodePenelitianKualitatif. Surakarta: UNS.

Sudjana, Nana .(2005). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: PT.

Uno, Hamzah, B. 2008. Model Pembelajaran :Menciptakan Proses BelajarMengajar yang KreatifdanEfektif. Ed.1, Cet. 3. Jakarta :BumiAksara.

Zainul, A. (2001). Alternative assessment applied approach mengajar di perguruan tinggi buku 2.09. Jakarta: Pusat Antar Universitas untuk Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Aktivitas InstruksionalDirjrn Dikti Depdiknas.

Wahana Komputer. (2011). Mengolah Data Statistik Penelitian dengan SPSS 18.Jakarta : PT. Gramedia.

Widaningsih,Yuliani Sri. (2010). Laboratorium Sejarah Univet Bantara Sukoharjo Sebagai Sumber Pembelajaran Pendidikan Sejarah ( Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Progdi Pendidikan Sejarah Univet Bantara Sukoharjo). Tesis . Solo :UNS

Diterbitkan

2021-05-28

Cara Mengutip

suwarni, suwarni, & Lestari, E. T. L. T. (2021). EFEKTIFITAS PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS LABORATORIUM PADA MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN SEJARAH IKIP PGRI PONTIANAK. KARMAWIBANGGA: Historical Studies Journal, 3(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.31316/fkip.v3i1.517

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles