Paradigma Etika Digital Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i2.5775Abstract
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali paradigma etika digital netizen dalam konteks Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan melalui pendekatan kajian pustaka. Dengan memanfaatkan analisis terhadap literatur dan teori-teori terkait dari para ahli, penelitian ini menjelajahi dinamika perilaku etika digital di kalangan netizen. Hasil kajian pustaka mengungkap aspek-aspek kunci, termasuk peran literasi digital, dampak ujaran kebencian, dan tantangan lainnya yang dihadapi dalam ruang digital. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi bahwa paradigma etika digital menjadi bagian integral dalam proses Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Netizen, sebagai pengguna aktif dalam dunia digital, memiliki peran strategis dalam membentuk opini publik dan memengaruhi tatanan sosial. Dengan merinci faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi etika digital, seperti desain platform media sosial, kebebasan berekspresi, dan perlindungan terhadap ujaran kebencian, penelitian ini memberikan wawasan mendalam terkait dengan dampaknya terhadap pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Dalam menghadapi kompleksitas dinamika ruang digital, integrasi etika digital ke dalam kurikulum pendidikan kewarganegaraan menjadi kunci utama untuk membentuk masyarakat yang terampil dalam teknologi dan bertanggung jawab dalam perilaku online. Sintesis antara tingkatan perkembangan moral dan paradigma etika digital menyoroti perlunya pendekatan holistik, yang mencakup pemahaman norma etika digital, konsekuensi tindakan online, dan komitmen terhadap nilai-nilai hak asasi manusia. Melalui pendekatan ini, pendidikan kewarganegaraan dapat membentuk netizen yang sadar etika, bertanggung jawab, dan aktif dalam membangun komunitas daring yang positif. Hal ini sejalan dengan tujuan menciptakan warga digital yang memberikan dampak positif dalam masyarakat secara keseluruhan.
Kata Kunci: Etika Digital, Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Etika
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Aunger, R. (2002). The electric meme: A new theory of how we think. The Free Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1988). The ecstasy of communication ( Bernard & Caroline Schutze, Trans., and Sylvére Lotringer, Ed.). Autonomedia.
Brough, M., Lapsansky, C., Gonzalez, C., Stokes, B., & Bar, F. (2018). Mobile Voices: Design as a method to explore the possibilities and limitations of community participation. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917737812
Burman, J. T. (2012). The misunderstanding of memes: Biography of an unscientific object, 1976-1999. Perspectives on Science, 20(1), 75–104.
Caren, N., Ghoshal, R. A., & Ribas, V. (2011). A Social Movement Generation. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410395369
Choi, M. (2016). A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818271
Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene (30th Anniversary ed.). Oxford University Press.
Del Vicario, M., Z., F., C., G., S., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2017). Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate. Social Networks, 50, 6–16.
Fadhlurrohman, F. (2021). Anilisi Ujaran Ofensif Terhadap Agama di Media Sosial Twitter. Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia, 78–82.
Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons, Rev. ed. In Multiple intelligences: New horizons, Rev. ed. Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2011). Truth, Beauty, and Goodness Reframed: Educating for the Virtues in the Twenty-First Century. Basic Book.
Karlsen, R., Steen-Johnsen, K., Wollebæk, D., & Enjolras, B. (2017). Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates. European Journal of Communication, 32(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117695734
Kemp, S. (2023). Digital 2023 Global Overview Report. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2023/01/digital-2023/
Kien, G. (2013). Media memes and prosumerist ethics: Notes toward a theoretical examination of memetic audience behavior. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613503785
Kipkoech, G. (2022). Connections Between Internet, Social Media News Use, and Political Participation in Kenya. Social Science Computer Review, 089443932110587. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211058702
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on Moral Development: The Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper & Row.
Literat, I., & Brough, M. (2019). From Ethical to Equitable Social Media Technologies: Amplifying Underrepresented Youth Voices in Digital Technology Design. Journal of Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 34(3), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2019.1638259
Michael, B. (2019). Living Media Ethics Across Platforms (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship. The internet, society, and participation. The MIT Press. file:///C:/Users/Iqbal Ar/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Mossberger, Tolbert, McNeal - 2008 - Digital citizenship. The internet, society, and participation.pdf
Nichols, B. (2003). The work of culture in the age of cybernetic systems. In N. Wardrip-Fruin & N. Montfort (Eds.). The MIT Press.
Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2
Ribble, M. (2011). Digital Citizenship in Schools. An Excerpt from Digital Citizenship in Schools 2nd Edition, 3777, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01378_9.x
Ribble, M. S., Bailey, G. D., & Ross, T. W. (2004). Digital Citizenship: Addressing Appropriate Technology Behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ695788%5Cnhttp://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ695788%5Cnhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ695788.pdf
Rice, E., & Barman-Adhikari, A. (2014). Internet and Social Media Use as a Resource Among Homeless Youth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12038
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Selwyn, Neil. (2016). Digital downsides: exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information diffu- sion in social media—Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 217–248.
Tarsidi, D. Z., Suryadi, K., Budimansyah, D., & Rahmat, R. (2023a). Social media usage and civic engagement among Indonesian digital natives: An analysis. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 20(257–269). https://doi.org/DOI. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v20i2.60812
Tarsidi, D. Z., Suryadi, K., Budimansyah, D., & Rahmat, R. (2023b). Unlocking Civic Participation: The Power of Digital Literacy for Indonesian Digital Natives. … Online Journal of …, 12(3), 292–307. https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/6797
Tarsidi, D. Z., Suryadi, K., Budimansyah, D., & Rahmat, R. (2023c). Unveiling Utopian Civic Engagement: Empowering Digital Natives through Digital Literacy for a Better Future. IJRAEL: International Journal of Religion Education and Law, 2(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.57235/ijrael.v2i2.681
Teräs, M. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. International Review of Education, 68(4), 635–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-022-09971-9
Widyatnyana, K. N., Rasna, I. W., & Putrayasa, I. B. (2023). Analisis Jenis Dan Makna Pragmatik Ujaran Kebencian Di Dalam Media Sosial Twitter. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, 12(1), 68–78.
Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hendy Satria Nugraha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
