Strategi Kontruktif Dan Dekonstruktif: Proses Identifikasi Pola Bilangan Mahasiswa Calon Guru SD

Authors

  • Iva Nurmawanti Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Radiusman Radiusman Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Linda Feni Haryati Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Sobri Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Ashar Pajarungi Anar Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31316/j.derivat.v7i2.1071

Abstract

This study aims to describe the process of identifying elementary student teacher candidates using constructive and deconstructive strategies. This study's research subjects were 6th-semester PGSD students of Mataram University who attended elementary mathematics learning courses. This type of research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Data collected in the form of test results about patterns and interviews. Then the data is analyzed. The results of the data analysis showed that there was no difference between the process of identifying student patterns using either constructive or deconstructive strategies. The process carried out by students is seeing the shape of the image compiler, making rules for each image, then determining the next pattern rules based on the rules that have been made previously in each image.

Keywords: pattern identification, constructive strategy, deconstructive strategy, figural pattern

References

Barbosa, dkk. (2007). The influence of visual strategies in generalization: a study with 6th grade students solving a pattern task. Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 2007, pp. 844-851

Barbosa, dkk. (2012). Pattern Problem Solving Tasks As A Mean To Foster Creativity In Mathematics. Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, 171-178. Taipei, Taiwan: PME.

Hourigan, A., & Leavy, A. (2015). What ’ s the Rule ? APMC, 20(4), 31–39.

Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0867-3

Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosda.

Montenegro, P., Costa, C., & Lopes, B. (2018). Transformations in the Visual Representation of a Figural Pattern. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1441599

Nurmawanti, Iva; Bambang, E.I; Sulandra, M. I. (2016). Identifikasi Pola Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Teori Gestalt. Jurnal Pembelajan Matematika, III(2), 154 – 161.

Nurmawanti, I., & Sulandra, I. M. (2020). Exploring o f Student ’ s Algebraic Thinking Process Through Pattern Generalization using Similarity or Proximity Perception. 9, 191–202.

Rivera, F. D. (2018). Pattern generalization processing of elementary students: Cognitive factors affecting the development of exact mathematical structures. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92554

Rivera, F. D., & Becker, J. R. (2008). Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0062-z

Samson, D. (2012). Pictorial pattern generalisation: Tension between local and global visualisation. Pythagoras, 33(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v33i3.172

Setiawan, Y. E., Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Sisworo. (2020). Generalization strategy of linear patterns from field-dependent cognitive style. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9134.77-94

Tanişlf, D., & Õzdaş, A. (2009). The strategies of using the generalizing patterns of the primary school 5th grade students. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 9(3), 1485–1497.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-20

Citation Check