Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Matematis Ditinjau dari Self Efficacy Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 226 Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31316/jderivat.v10i2.6621Abstract
Computational thinking ability is the ability to solve complex problems with algorithmic solutions based on computational aspects. Self efficacy is a belief in one's own abilities. The subjects in this study are class VIII-H students at SMPN 226 Jakarta as many as 34 students who will then be selected 3 students based on the categorization of self efficacy questionnaire (high, medium, and low) to be interviewed. A qualitative approach with a descriptive form was used with the aim of describing the ability of mathematical computational thinking in terms of self efficacy in class VIII students at SMPN 226 Jakarta. Data were collected from questionnaires, written description tests, and interview guidelines, then analyzed through data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing. The results showed that students in the high self efficacy category met four indicators, namely, decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithmic thinking. Students with moderate self efficacy fulfill three indicators, namely, decomposition, pattern recognition, and abstraction. Meanwhile, students with low self efficacy fulfill two indicators namely, decomposition, and pattern recognition. In addition, the results of this study indicate that the better the self efficacy in students, the better the mathematical computational thinking ability.
Keywords: Mathematical Computational Thinking Ability, Self Efficacy
References
Aisy, A. R., & Hakim, D. L. (2023). Kemampuan Berfikir Komputasi Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Pola Bilangan. Didactical Mathematics, 5(2), 348–360.
Ansori, M. (2020). Pemikiran Komputasi (Computational Thinking) dalam Pemecahan Masalah. Dirasah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 111–126.
Augie, K. T., & Priatna, N. (2021). Penggunaan Podcast Untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa selama Gangguan Pandemi. Didactical Mathematics, 3(1), 41–47.
Azizah, N. I., Roza, Y., & Maimunah. (2022). Computational Thinking Process of High School Students in Solving Sequences and Series Problems. Jurnal Analisa, 8(1), 23–32.
Azizia, A. J., Kusmaryono, I., Maharani, H. R., & Arifuddin, A. (2023). Students’ Computational Thinking Process in Solving PISA Problems of Change and Relationship Content Reviewed from Students’ Self Efficacy. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v12i1.13132
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education. In Joint Research Centre (JRC) (Issue June). https://doi.org/10.2791/792158
Christi, S. R. N., & Rajiman, W. (2023). Pentingnya Berpikir Komputasional dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Journal on Education, 5(4), 12590–12598. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2246
Damianti, D., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan self-efficacy siswa SMP. INSPIRAMATIKA. http://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/Inspiramatika/article/view/2958
Figueiredo, J. A. Q. (2017). How to Improve Computational Thinking: a Case Study. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 18(4), 35–51.
Hardani, Andriani, H., Ustiawty, J., Utami, E. F., Istiqomah, R. R., Fardani, R. A., Sukmana, D. J., & Auliya, N. H. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif: Vol. Vol. 1.
Indirwan, Suarni, W., & Priyatmo, D. (2021). Pentingnya Self-Efficacy terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Sublimapsi, 2(1), 61–70.
Jamna, N. D., Hamid, H., & Bakar, M. T. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Matematika, 2(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.33387/jpgm.v2i3.5149
Kallia, M., van Borkulo, S. P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2021). Characterising Computational Thinking in Mathematics Education: a Literature-Informed Delphi Study. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 159–187.
Lase, D. (2019). Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Journal Sunderman, 1(1), 28–43.
Lee, T. Y., Mauriello, M. L., Ahn, J., & Bederson, B. B. (2014). CTArcade: Computational Thinking with Games in School Age Children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 26–33.
Lestari, A. C., & Annizar, A. M. (2020). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah PISA Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi. Jurnal Kiprah, 8(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v8i1.2063
Lestari, S., & Roesdiana, L. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Program Linear. RANGE: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 178–188.
Marifah, R. A., & Kartono. (2023). Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa SMP Ditinjau dari Self-Efficacy pada Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Edmodo. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 6, 480–489.
Mukhibin, A., & Himmah, W. I. (2020). An Analysis of Mathematical Self-Efficacy of the 10th Grade MIPA Students of MAN Salatiga. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 8–14.
Nurwita, F., Kusumah, Y. S., & Priatna, N. (2022). Exploring Students’ Mathematical Computational Thinking Ability in Solving Pythagorean Theorem Problems. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i2.12496
Nuvitalia, D., Saptaningrum, E., Ristanto, S., & Putri, M. R. (2022). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional (Computational Thinking) Siswa SMP Negeri Se-Kota Semarang Tahun 2022. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 13(2), 211–218.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. In OECD Publishing: Vol. I. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Park, Y., & Green, J. (2019). Review Bringing Computational Thinking into Science Education in the 21 Century. Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 40(4), 340–352.
Rahayu, G. S. I., & Zanthy, L. S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpkir Kreatif Matematis dan Self Efficacy Siswa SMP Terhadap Soal Persamaan Garis Lurus. Journal on Education, 01(03), 243–251.
Rahmadhani, L. I. P., & Mariani, S. (2021). Kemampuan Komputasional Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika SMP Melalui Digital Project Based Learning Ditinjau dari Self Efficacy. … Seminar Nasional Matematika, 4, 289–297.
Ratnaningtyas, E. M., Ramli, Syafruddin, Saputra, E., Nugroho, B. T. A., Karimuddin, Aminy, M. H., Saputra, N., Khaidir, & Jahja, A. S. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.
Sa’diyyah, F. N., Mania, S., & Suharti. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 4(1), 17–26.
Said, R. S., Subarinah, S., Baidowi, & Sripatmi. (2021). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy Siswa Kelas VIII Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021. Griya Journal of …, 1(3), 306–315. https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/article/view/84
Samsuddin, A. F., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Self-efficacy Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 17.
Silvia, R. D., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., & Nizaruddin. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Computational Thinking Siswa pada Materi Aljabar Ditinjau dari Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Prismatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Riset Matematika, 5(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.33503/prismatika.v5i2.2659
Subaidi, A. (2016). Self-Efficacy Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. ∑Igma, 1(2), 64–68.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.
Supiarmo, M. G., Turmudi, & Susanti, E. (2021). Proses Berpikir Komputasional Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pisa Konten Change and Relationship Berdasarkan Self-Regulated Learning. Numeracy, 8(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v9i1.1750
Wing, J. M. (2017). Computational Thinking’s Influence on Research and Education for All. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/922
Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568.
Yuliana, D., & Miatun, A. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Self Efficacy Dan Gender. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 10(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.25157/jwp.v10i2.11126
Yusup, M. A., Herlambang, A. D., & Wijoyo, S. H. (2023). Pengaruh Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasi terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Dasar Desain Grafis Jurusan TKJ di SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Malang. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 7(2), 781–795. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id
Zahid, M. Z. (2020). Telaah Kerangka Kerja PISA 2021: Era Integrasi Computational Thinking dalam Bidang Matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 3(2020), 706–713.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Haniifah, Esti Ambar Nugraheni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
