EVALUASI KEKUATAN MILITER INDONESIA BERDASARKAN KONSEP REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS (RMA) (2004-2021)

Authors

  • Peni Hanggarini Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Taufik Bagus Murdianto Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Purnomo Yusgiantoro Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • I Wayan Midhio Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Asep Darmawan Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Muhamad Idris Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v6i1.2108

Keywords:

Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA), Indonesia, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Politics, Economy, Social, Technology, Law, Environment (PESTLE) dan Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Threat (SWOT)

Abstract

Abstrak

Indonesia telah melakukan transformasi teknologi militer, persenjataan, organisasi dan doktrin militer dalam menghadapi perubahan lingkungan internal dan eksternal. Apakah transformasi militer tersebut sesuai dengan konsep Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA)? Tulisan ini menganalisa komponen RMA Indonesia manakah yang paling penting berhasil dilakukan sejak 2004 hingga 2021? Pada periode kapan RMA paling baik telah terjadi? Tulisan ini berdasarkan penelitian metode campuran (mix method). Metodologi kuantitatif berdasarkan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) serta metode kualitatif berdasarkan Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Threat (SWOT) melalui pertimbangan aspek Politik, Ekonomi, Sosial, Teknologi, Lingkungan/Environment, Hukum/Legal/Law (PESTLE). Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui kuesioner terhadap 9 responden ahli RMA, interview serta analisa literature. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan komando, kontrol, computer dan integrasi sistem (C4) merupakan komponen RMA yang paling penting di Indonesia sejak 2004 hingga 2021. Pelaksanaan RMA terbaik yaitu pada 2009 hingga 2014. Analisa SWOT menunjukkan militer Indonesia masih belum optimal menangani perubahan ancaman dari dalam maupun luar sehingga perlu melakukan strategi diversifikasi.

Kata kunci: Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA), Indonesia, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Politics, Economy, Social, Technology, Law, Environment (PESTLE) dan Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Threat (SWOT) 

 

Abstract

Indonesia has transformed its military technology, weapons, organization, and military doctrine corresponding to its environments. However, is the transformation in line with the Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) concept? This paper evaluates components undertaken of Indonesian RMA from 2004 to 2021, also examines when Indonesia performed the best RMA. The study utilized the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a quantitative methodology; and the Politic, Economy, Social, Technology, Environment, Law, and (PESTLE) and Strength-Weakness-Opportunity- Threat (SWOT) for the quantitative side.  The paper uses nine expert questionnaires, interviews, and literature reviews for data collection. The result shows that command, control, computers, and system integration are the most significant RMA components from 2004 to 2021. The best RMA takes place from 2009 to 2014. The SWOT analysis indicates that the Indonesian military is still not optimal in anticipating changes from within and outside; thus, it is imperative to carry out a diversification strategy.

Keywords: Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA), Indonesia, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Politics, Economy, Social, Technology, Law, Environment (PESTLE), and Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Threats (SWOT).

Author Biographies

Peni Hanggarini, Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

Doctoral Student

Taufik Bagus Murdianto, Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

Doctoral Student

Purnomo Yusgiantoro, Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

Professor

I Wayan Midhio, Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

Professor

Asep Darmawan, Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

Doctoral Student

Muhamad Idris, Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

Doctoral Student

References

Ardila, R., & Putra, A. K. (2021). Sengketa Wilayah Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia (Studi Kasus Klaim Cina Atas Laut Natuna Utara). Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 1(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v1i3.10895

Bagus, P., Baylon, A., Adi, O. B., Aiko, L., Silalahi, R., Sitanggang, S. H., Naufal, D., Ghifari, A., Susanto, B., Syarifizal, L. M., Afifah, A. N., & Sulaiman, Q. T. (2021). Kajian Validitas Klaim China Atas Wilayah Laut Cina Selatan Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 691–700.

Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004). Strategic Decision Making, Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In Springer, USA.

Chin, W. (2019). Technology, war and the state: Past, present and future. International Affairs, 95(4), 765–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz106

Creswell, J. W., & Plano, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage.

Herdijanto, T., Mulyadi, & Susilo, A. K. (2019). Development Strategy of Revolution in Military Affair Concept by Indonesia Armed Forces (TNI) in the South China Sea. Journal of Defense Resources Management, 10(2), 40–61. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2339150412?accountid=17242

Liaropoulos, A. N. (2006). Revolutions in warfare: Theoretical paradigms and historical evidence - The Napoleonic and First World War Revolutions in Military Affairs. Journal of Military History, 70(2), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1353/jmh.2006.0106

Matteo, B. (2015). Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Proces. In Springer, USA. Springer, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132886

Medendehe, R. J. (2021). Penanganan Pelanggaran Hukum Di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Perairan Natuna. Lex Et Societatis, 9(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v9i1.32050

Nugraha, M. H. R. (2017). Perencanaan Strategis Pertahanan Masa Depan Indonesia: Analisis Pada Lingkungan Strategis Asia Tenggara (ASEAN) Periode 2015-2020. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 7(3), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v7i3.235

Park, C., Petri, P. A., & Plummer, M. (2021). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and Recent Trade Policy Developments in Asia and the Pacific: Detailed Results. In SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3866164

Prayoga, A., Mahroza, J., & Waluyo, S. D. (2021). Indonesian Defense Strategy to Encounter Challenges in the Indo-Pacific (Case Study: Hegemonic War of China and the United States of America in the South China Sea). International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 04(10), 2880–2889. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i10-30

Rahmelia, S. (2021). Pemaknaan Mahasiswa Terhadap Narasi Konflik Beragama. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 45–54.

Salsabila, F. Y. (2019). Radikalisme Sebagai Bibit Perpecahan Antar Umat Beragama. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 3(2), 97–102. https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/viewFile/1309/pdf

Samego, I. (2015). Kontekstualisasi “Sishannegâ€: Pemberdayaan Wilayah Pertahanan Dalam Perspektif Perubahan. 5(April 2015), 1–14. http://jurnal.idu.ac.id/index.php/JPBH/article/view/345

Santoso, R. Y. (2021). The Influence of Revolution in Military Affairs on Indonesian Defense. Jurnal Analisis Sosial Politik, 5(1), 54–61.

Silverstein, A. B. (2013). Revolutions in Military Affairs : A Theory On First- Mover Advantage. CUREJ College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal, April.

Sirimanne, S. N. (2019). Review of Maritime Transport 2019 Slower maritime trade growth in 2018-2019 (Issue November).

Sulistyaningrum, E. (2018). Aplikasi AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) untuk Hierarchical Analysis. In Jogiyanto Hartono (Ed.), Metoda Pengumpulan dan Teknik Analisis Data. Penerbit Andi.

Sun, L. (2021). Measurement Analysis of Trade Facilitation in China-asean Free Trade Area. E3S Web of Conferences, 251, 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125101023

Sutopo, A. (2021). Penelitian Kualitatif dengan NVivo. Ariesto.

Veraditha, C., & Impiani. (2018). Tranformasi Pertahanan Indonesia di Era Reformasi (1998-2018): Perspektif Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA). Jurnal Defendonesia, 5(April 2021), 63–73.

Widiantoro, V., Ichsan, M., & Saputra, P. D. (2021). Measurement Analysis of Box Girder Production Cycle Times in Indonesia Infrastructure Projects. Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Science and Technology (BIS-STE 2020), Advances in Engineering Research, 203, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210810.002

Yang, X.-J. (2021). Delta-1 variant of SARS-COV-2 acquires spike V1264L and drives the pandemic in Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-999390/v1

Downloads

Published

2022-01-03

Issue

Section

Articles