Pengembangan Konsep Techno-Nasionalism Dalam Peningkatan Penguasaan Teknologi Industri Pertahanan

Authors

  • Leni Tria Melati Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Mala Utami Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Kasim Kasim Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v6i1.2814

Abstract

Abstrak

Penguasaan teknologi dalam Industri Pertahanan di Indonesia masih belum optimal. Berbagai faktor dapat mendasari hal ini. Salah satu upaya peningkatan penguasaan teknologi pertahanan tersebut, dapat dilakukan dengan pengembangan konsep techno-nasionalism. Konsep ini sendiri telah banyak diusung oleh beberapa negara yang terbukti memiliki Industri Pertahanan yang tangguh seperti Jepang dan China. Menanggapi hal ini, dilakukan analisa menggunakan Causal Dynamics Loop berupa archetypes untuk memudahkan pemahaman masalah penguasaan teknologi dalam Industri Pertahanan Indonesia serta untuk memahami pengembangan konsep techno-nasionalism di Indonesia. Dilanjutkan analisa SWOT untuk menentukan jenis strategi yang dapat digunakan. Berdasarkan hasil analisa, untuk menangani rendahnya penguasaan teknologi pertahanan dapat dimulai dengan peningkatan kualitas sumber daya manusia bersamaan dengan proses manajemen sumber daya manusia yang tepat. Selain itu, perlu perlibatan sipil dalam industri pertahanan, juga produksi produk dengan dual use technology.  Sehingga dalam hal ini pengembangan konsep techno-nasionalism memiliki peranan yang penting untuk mendorong peningkatan penguasaan teknologi dalam Industri Pertahanan di Indonesia.

Kata kunci: Archetypes, Industri Pertahanan, Techno-nasionalism, SWOT

Abstract

The mastery of technology in Indonesia defence industry, needs to be further developed. To increase the mastery of defense technology can be done by  the application of techno-nationalism concept. The concept itself has been widely promoted by several countries that proven to have a formidable Defense Industry such as Japan and China. In responses to this, an analysis was carried out using CDL in the form of archetypes, to facilitate the understanding of  main problems in the process of  technology mastery in Indonesian Defense Industry and to understand the development of techno-nationalism concept in Indonesia. Followed by a SWOT analysis to determine the type of strategy that can be used. Based on the results of the analysis, to deal with the low mastery of defense technology, it can be started by improving the quality of human resources along with proper human resource management processes. In addition, civil involvement in the defense industry is needed, as well as the production of products with dual use technology. It can be concluded that the application of techno-nationalism concept has an important role to encourage increased mastery of technology in the Defense Industry in Indonesia.

Keywords: Archetypes, Defense Industry, Techno-nasionalism, SWOT

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Aini, R. Q., & Triantama, F. (2021). The Implementation of South Korea’s Military Technology Reform in The Perspective of Techno-nationalism. Jurnal Sosial Politik, 7(1), 63-76.

Aryanto, R., Fontana, A., & Afiff, A. Z. (2015). Strategic human resource management, innovation capability and performance: An empirical study in Indonesia software industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 874-879.

Branz., M, Farrell, A., Hu, M., Liem, W. & Ballard, E. (2021). System Archetypes. Methods Brief Series 1.07: Systems Thinking Foundations. Social System Design Lab: St. Louis, MO. https://doi.org/10.7936/c89k-d163

Besha, P. (2011). Civil-military integration in China: a techno-nationalist approach to development. American Journal of Chinese Studies, 97-111.

Bitzinger, R. A. (2015). Defense industries in Asia and the technonationalist impulse. Contemporary security policy, 36(3), 453-472.

Chairil, T. (2017). The politics behind Alpalhankam: Military and politico-security factors in Indonesia’s arms procurements, 2005–2015. In Competition and Cooperation in Social and Political Sciences (pp. 281-290). Routledge.

Chandrakumara, P. M. K. (2013). A: Human resources management practices in small and medium enterprises in two emerging economies in Asia: Indonesia and South Korea. Annual SEAANZ Conference 1-15.

David, F. R., (2012). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach, concepts. 14th Ed. Upper Saddle River : Prentice Hall Publication.

Dhirasasna, N., & Sahin, O. (2019). A multi-methodology approach to creating a causal loop diagram. Systems, 7(42), 1-36.

Gurel E. & Tat M. (2017). SWOT analysis: a theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research 10: 994–1006.

Haraldsson, H. V. (2004). Introduction to system thinking and causal loop diagrams. Lund, Sweden: Department of chemical engineering, Lund University.

Hesami A., M., Moslemzadeh, M., Fallahzadeh, O., Khorvash, H., Dakhilpour, M., & Mohammadzadeh, M. (2021). Assessment of COVID-19 control strategies in a steel industry using a SWOT matrix. Toxicology and industrial health, 37(6), 353-364.

Hughes, C. W. (2011). The slow death of Japanese techno-nationalism? Emerging comparative lessons for China's defense production. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(3), 451-479.

Jaakkola E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Rev. 2020, 1–9.

Jannah, N. F., Apriyanto, I. N. P., & Bura, R. O. (2021). Sinergitas Industri Pertahanan Dalam Pemenuhan Minimum Essential Force Matra Laut. Industri Pertahanan, 3(1), 48-62.

Kusumah, D., & Purwantoro, S. A. (2022). PERKEMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN INDUSTRI PERTAHANAN INDONESIA DALAM SETIAP MASANYA. JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 10(1), 228-233.

Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255-256.

Luo, Z., & Qin, Z. (2012). SWOT analysis of functions of Chinese universities. IERI Procedia, 2(2012), 253-257

Manning, R. A. (2019). Techno-nationalism vs. the fourth industrial revolution. Global Asia, 14(1), 14-21.

Manteghi, N., & Zohrabi, A. (2011). A proposed comprehensive framework for formulating strategy: a Hybrid of balanced scorecard, SWOT analysis, porter‘s generic strategies and Fuzzy quality function deployment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2068-2073.

Nakayama, S. (2012). Techno-nationalism versus Techno-globalism. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 6(1), 9-15.

Novana R.F. (2012). Kerjasama Indonesia Dalam Militer Pemerintahan Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Periode 2004- 2009 (Indonesian Military Cooperation in the Period of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono 2004-2009). Jurnal Transnasional Universitasgoogoo Riau, 3(2).

Saputra, O. I., Darmawan, W. B., & Dermawan, W. (2022). KEBIJAKAN KEMENTERIAN PERTAHANAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM MEMPERKUAT ALAT UTAMA SISTEM PERTAHANAN UDARA. Aliansi: Jurnal Politik, Keamanan Dan Hubungan Internasional, 1(1), 72-80.

Sebastian, E. (2018). Peningkatan peranan SDM pertahanan nasional guna menghadapi perang generasi keempat. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 5(1), 109-128.

Sebastian, L. C., & Gindarsah, I. (2013). Assessing military reform in Indonesia. Defense & Security Analysis, 29(4), 293-307.

Siahaan, T., Sovian, A., & Egkrateia, P. (2018). Analisis Kesiapan PT. Pindad dalam Memproduksi Brass Cup Sebagai Bahan Baku Munisi Guna Mendukung Pertahanan Negara. Jurnal Pertahanan dan Bela Negara 1(1), 29-46.

Sterman, J.D. (2002). Business Dynamics: System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston : Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Sura, A. L. (2021). Indonesia's military and technical cooperation with other countries: current trends and developments. Thesis. Saint Petersburg State University.

Susdarwono, E. T. 2021. Ekonomi Industri Pertahanan: Konsep Dual-Use Technologies (Spin On & Spin Off) Sebagai Upaya Percepatan Kemandirian Industri Pertahanan Indonesia. Vol. 3 (2), pp : 135-153.

Sutikno, A. N. (2020). Bonus Demografi di Indonesia. VISIONER: Jurnal Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia, 12(2), 421-439.

UNCTAD (2006). Bridging The Technology Gap Between And Within Nations. New York: United Nations

Wilhite, A., Burns, L., Patnayakuni, R., & Tseng, F. (2014). Military supply chains and closed-loop systems: resource allocation and incentives in supply sourcing and supply chain design. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 1926-1939.

Zhang, T. (2018). Global Economic Challenges and Opportunities. National Association for Business Economics, 53, 3-9.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-13

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): June 2022

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Leni Tria Melati, Mala Utami, Kasim Kasim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Lisensi Creative Commons

This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.