Persepsi Antroposentrisme Pancasila dan Implikasinya dalam Masyarakat Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i1.4606Abstract
Abstrak
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persepsi antroposentrisme Pancasila dan implikasinya dalam masyarakat Indonesia. Pancasila sebagai dasar negara Indonesia mencerminkan nilai-nilai keberagaman, inklusivitas, dan keseimbangan antara manusia dan alam. Namun, persepsi antroposentrisme yang terlalu dominan dalam masyarakat dapat mempengaruhi implementasi Pancasila dan hubungan manusia dengan lingkungan. Metode penelitian kualitatif digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan pendekatan analisis isi terhadap literatur, dokumen resmi, dan data relevan. Penelitian ini juga melibatkan wawancara mendalam dengan sejumlah responden yang mewakili berbagai latar belakang dan perspektif di masyarakat Indonesia. Hasil analisis menunjukkan variasi dalam persepsi antroposentrisme terhadap Pancasila dalam masyarakat Indonesia. Beberapa pihak memandang Pancasila sebagai pandangan yang memberikan keutamaan dan dominasi kepada manusia dalam segala aspek kehidupan, termasuk hubungan manusia dengan alam. Namun, ada juga pandangan yang lebih inklusif, mengedepankan keseimbangan dan keberagaman dalam menjalankan nilai-nilai Pancasila.
Kata Kunci : Pancasila, Pembangunan Keberlanjutan, Lingkungan, Filsafat
References
Affifi, R. (2020). Anthropocentrism’s fluid binary. Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), 1435–1452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1707484
Altun, D. (2020). Preschoolers’ pro-environmental orientations and theory of mind: ecocentrism and anthropocentrism in ecological dilemmas. Early Child Development and Care, 190(11), 1820–1832. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1542385
Azizmohammadi, F., & Kohzadi, H. (2014). The Impact of Anthropocentrism on Natural Environment from the Perspective of Margaret Atwood. The Anthropologist, 17(2), 647–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891474
Bubbio, P. D. (2022). Kenosis, Nature, and Anthropocentrism: A Response to Fulvi. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 14(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2022.2146062
Calvo-Salguero, A., Aguilar-Luzón, M.-C., Salinas-Martínez-de-Lecea, J.-M., & García-Martínez, J.-M.-Á. (2014). Gender, masculinity and femininity as ecocentrism and anthropocentrism predictors / Género, masculinidad y feminidad como predictores del ecocentrismo y el antropocentrismo. PsyEcology, 5(2–3), 284–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2014.942509
Gansmo Jakobsen, T. (2017). Environmental Ethics: Anthropocentrism and Non-anthropocentrism Revised in the Light of Critical Realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2016.1265878
Kahriman-Ozturk, D., Olgan, R., & Tuncer, G. (2012). A Qualitative Study on Turkish Preschool Children’s Environmental Attitudes Through Ecocentrism and Anthropocentrism. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.596228
Krajewska, A. (2017). The Anthropocene Shifts in Visual Arts: A Case against Anthropocentrism. De Arte, 52(2–3), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2017.1332504
López, J., García, J., Cano, C.-J., & Casado, M.-P. (2012). Anthropocentrism and ecocentrism in potential technology-based entrepreneurs. PsyEcology, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119712800337756
Misiaszek, G. W. (2022). Ecopedagogy: Freirean teaching to disrupt socio-environmental injustices, anthropocentric dominance, and unsustainability of the Anthropocene. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2130044
Quinn, F., Castéra, J., & Clément, P. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions of the environment: anthropocentrism, non-anthropocentrism, anthropomorphism and the place of nature. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 893–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1076767
Reeves, J.-A., & Peters, T. D. (2021). Responding to anthropocentrism with anthropocentrism: the biopolitics of environmental personhood. Griffith Law Review, 30(3), 474–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2037882
Rowley, L., & Johnson, K. A. (2018). Anthropomorphic Anthropocentrism and the Rhetoric of Blackfish. Environmental Communication, 12(6), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1167757
Vallée, M. (2020). Using fiction to enhance learning in environmental sociology courses. Environmental Sociology, 6(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2019.1690727
Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Raymond Kelvin Nando, Jagad Aditya Dewantara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
