Analysis of Papua Separatist Group Insurgency and the Indonesian Government's Contra-Insurgency from an International Law Perspective

Authors

  • Zulfikar Fabri Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Djayeng Tirto Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Puguh Santoso Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i1.5204

Abstract

Rebellion or insurgency is one possible threat that interferes with the sovereignty and security of a country; the insurgency is come by the presence of non-state actors against state actors with the use source Power political and military with objective take over state power. The Papuan conflict began from marginal dissatisfaction and poverty, giving rise to a passion for liberation self, with do attacks, rebellions, and killings committed by the now OPM Free Papua Organization labeled as Papuan Terrorist Separatist Group KSTP. Therefore, it is essential to analyze descriptive qualitative To use study Insurgency and cons Insurgency from an international law perspective. According to International Law, The OPM status mentioned as Group Separatist Papuan terrorists (KSTP) are not as organization or Beligerent. Therefore, the government so far labeled the group as an insurgent. Based on Policy in progress conflict Papua terrorists who have differences in application, the Indonesian government has carried out effort Soft Power, Hard Power, and Smart Power strategies. As for the shape can form Cold counter-insurgency and hot counter-insurgency. Every effort settlement conflict insurgency must customize with conditions and form their respective territories.

Keywords: Insurjency, Papuan Terrorist Separatist Group, International Law

References

Ambarwati, dkk, Hukum Humaniter Internasional dalam Studi Hubungan. Internasional, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013

Fadilah, Agus. Pemberontakan dan Kontra Insurjensi, Jakarta: FRR Law Office, Jakarta, 2006

Galula, David, Counter Insurgency Warfare; Theory and Practice, London; Frederick A. Praeger 1964, hal 4.

Hapsari, Sekar, Faktor Pendorong Terjadinya Insurgensi Di Suatu Wilayah, ISSN: 2338 4638 Volume 2 Nomor 9c, Jakarta 2018.

Konvensi Jenewa III 1949.

Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, hal 8.

Montevideo Convention On The Rights And Duties Of States 1933.

Rаdjа, Richard, Supporting Orgаnizаtion of the Free Pаpuа Movement (OPM) Overseаs,Globаl Future Institute, 2012, hal. 1.

Sasongko, Sigit. "Diplomasi Insurjensi Dalam Peperangan Asimetris," Vol. 1 No. 1 Desember, Jakarta, 2013.

Sugono, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Kamus Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas, Jakarta, 2008.

Suryokusumo, Sumaryo, Studi Kasus Hukum Internasional, PT Tatanusa, Jakarta, 2007.

Thontowi, Jawahir dan Pranoto Iskandar, Hukum Internasional Kontemporer, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2006.

Undang-Undang No. 21 Tаhun 2001 tentаng Otonomi Khusus Bаgi Provinsi Pаpuа.

Undang-Undang No. 3 tahun 2002 tentang Pertahanan Negara

Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2018entang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme, terkait tindakan dan penggolongan OPM yang dapat di kategorikan sebagai teroris.

Undang-Undang No.12 Tаhun 1969 tentаng Pembentukаn Dаerаh Otonomi Iriаn Bаrаt dаn Kаbupаten Otonom di Propinsi Iriаn Bаrаt

Wayan Parthiana, Pengantar Hukum Internasional, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 1990.

Wijata, Bima Ari Putri. Insurgency and Belligerency, Semarang, 2013.

Wilkinson, Paul, Terrorism versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response, London, Frank Cass, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-28

Issue

Section

Articles