The Role of the Constitutional Court in Impeachment and the Differences in Impeachment Procedures in Indonesia and the United States

Authors

  • Jeane Neltje Saly Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Vanessa Wijaya Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i2.5416

Abstract

Abstract

This research aims to study the impeachment of the president and/or vice president comparatively. The countries compared are countries that adhere to a presidential system, namely Indonesia and the United States. Issues that upbring by this research are how is the role of constitutional court in terms of impeachment and how significant differences in impeachment procedures both in Indonesia and United States. Using normative legal research or library research methods. This research only discusses written regulations, so this research is closely related to libraries because it will require additional data in the library. The results of research, scientific works, statutory regulations, legal theories, and opinions of scholars or doctrine. The power to proselytize the President and/or Vice President is vested in representative bodies, namely the People's Representative Council in the Indonesian Constitutional System and the People's Representative Council in the American Constitutional System.

Keywords: Impeachment, President, Vice President; Indonesia; United States.

 

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Budiman, H. (2018). Skenario Pemakzulan Presiden Jokowi. Media Pressindo.

Faiz, P. M., & Collins, J. S. (2018). Penambahan Kewenangan Constitutional Question di Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Upaya untuk Melindungi Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara (Expanding the Authority of Constitutional Question in the Constitutional Court as an Effort for Protecting Citizens’ Constitutional Rights). Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(4), 688–709.

Firdaus, D. M. (2018). Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (DPR RI) Terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Jurnal Asy Syariah, 20(2).

Indonesia, M. K. R. (2010). Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Buku VIII, Jakarta: Kepaniteraan MKRI.

Konstitusi, T. P. H. A. M. (2010). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Dan Kepaniteraan MKRI.

Kristiyanto, E. N. (2013). Pemakzulan Presiden Republik Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2(3), 331–342.

Panduwinata, I. (2012). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pasal 7 ayat (6A) Dalam UndangUndang Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara Perubahan 2012 Terhadap UUD NRI 1945 dan Dampaknya Kepada Masyarakat/oleh Ivan Panduwinata. Universitas Tarumanegara.

Rusdianto, S., & SH, M. H. (2010). Proses Impeachment Presiden Dalam Konstitusi Negara Modern (Studi Perbandingan dengan Mekanisme Impeachment di Amerika Serikat dan Korea Selatan). Jurnal Hukum, 19(19), 111–122.

Siregar, L. H. (2016). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(2), 287–312.

Sutiyoso, B. (2016). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(1), 91–110.

Wiyanto, A. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Presiden dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(3), 209–232.

Zoelva, H. (2011). Pemakzulan presiden di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-06

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Desember 2023

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jeane Neltje Saly, Vanessa Wijaya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Lisensi Creative Commons

This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.